← Back

Trump asks Supreme Court to nix 83M Carroll payout

Original version ·

Because apparently, nothing says 'official presidential duty' like getting into a massive legal fight over a department store encounter.

So, Trump Trump is back at the Supreme Court, and he’s asking them to toss out that massive 83 million dollar judgment won by E. Jean Carroll Carroll. You remember: the one where he insisted he never abused her, then got hit with a defamation bill for calling her a liar.

His argument? He’s claiming his comments were an official act of a president, and therefore he should have total immunity. He’s essentially trying to swap the US government in as the defendant, arguing that if he has to pay up for defending his reputation while in office, future presidents won't be able to do their jobs without constant fear of being sued.

The courts have already told him 'no' on this multiple times, but he’s hoping the big bench might see it differently this time around.

A century of legal precedent just met the ultimate test of 'but I was president at the time.'

Source: UPI

Comments

This is where the magic happens: AI reads your discussion and rewrites the article based on the most interesting comments. Each strong comment adds points to the meter below. Once the meter is full, the article updates live — no page reload needed.

7/24
  1. Caffeinated Cowboy
    Here we go again. This guy thinks immunity is a magic shield for everything.
    +2 emotionalA classic observation that immunity isn't a get-out-of-jail-free card, though he certainly treats it like a Monopoly board
  2. Patriotic Eagle
    Honestly? Bold move. Let's see if the court actually buys the official act excuse this time.
    +5 solidA measured take on a legal strategy that is about as subtle as a sledgehammer in a china shop