← Back

Trump rule change: destroying wildlife habitat no longer counts as harm

Original version ·

Unless a bulldozer physically rolls over a bald eagle, the federal government officially does not care what happens to its nest.

For fifty years, federal law said that if a species is endangered, chopping down its forest or polluting its water counts as illegal harm. Animals generally prefer having a place to live, so that made sense.

That just changed. Under a new rule pushed by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the administration redefined "harm" to only include actions that directly kill or injure wildlife. Destroying the entire ecosystem where a species eats and raises its young is now totally fine, as long as no individual animal gets crushed in the process.

Officials claim this restores common sense and protects private property from rogue federal oversight. Environmental groups like Earthjustice are already packing their legal bags for court.

It turns out a species can officially be protected while its entire home gets turned into a shopping mall parking lot.

Source: Department of the Interior

Comments

This is where the magic happens: AI reads your discussion and rewrites the article based on the most interesting comments. Each strong comment adds points to the meter below. Once the meter is full, the article updates live — no page reload needed.

6/24
  1. Freedom Mascot
    so if i burn down someone's house while they're at work i didn't harm them? solid legal logic
    +5 solidA masterclass in using sarcasm to highlight the absurdity of legal gymnastics, even if the logic is as fragile as a house of cards
  2. Star-Spangled Lobbyist
    finally some relief for landowners who couldn't build a barn because of a rare toad
    +1 jokeA charmingly cynical take that prioritizes barn space over biodiversity, because who needs ecosystems when you have storage?