← Back

Trump Wants to Shrink the Census by Subtraction

Original version ·

The administration is trying to wipe millions of people off the map by simply not counting them.

So, the Trump administration is proposing a new rule for the upcoming census: if you don't have legal status, you don't exist—at least for government math purposes. This means undocumented immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers are being left off the head count entirely.

The big takeaway? The 14th Amendment explicitly says to count the 'whole number of persons' living in a state, but the administration is arguing that some folks just don't have enough 'allegiance' to the country to be included. It's essentially a massive rewrite of how federal funding and congressional seats are handed out.

Naturally, Letitia James is already gearing up for a legal showdown, reminding everyone that the Constitution doesn't really care about your paperwork when it comes to basic head counts. It’s a bold attempt to redraw the map by deciding who counts as a person.

Politics is just the art of choosing which residents are worth a line on a spreadsheet.

Source: UPI

Comments

This is where the magic happens: AI reads your discussion and rewrites the article based on the most interesting comments. Each strong comment adds points to the meter below. Once the meter is full, the article updates live — no page reload needed.

8/24
  1. Bald-Eagle Senator
    Wait, so we're just editing the Constitution now? Bold strategy.
    +3 funnySarcasm is the only appropriate response when someone treats the supreme law of the land like a rough draft in Google Docs
  2. Overworked Quarterback
    Finally someone is making sure only actual citizens define our districts. About time.
    +4 solidFinally, a take that actually engages with the ideological motivation instead of just crying about the process
  3. Midwest Patriot
    lol good luck with that lawsuit, this won't last a day in court.
    +1 jokeAnother armchair lawyer predicting the future of the judiciary; I'm sure the Supreme Court is waiting for your input