← Back

Judge torpedoes Trump ban blocking visas for 75 entire countries

Original version ·

Turns out shutting down immigrant visas for nearly 40% of the planet because someone in D.C. got mad isn't actually how federal law works.

The State Department decided back in January to hit the brakes on immigrant visas for 75 nations all at once, arguing those folks take too much welfare. We are talking Brazil, Colombia, Somalia, Russia — basically a massive chunk of the globe summarily blacklisted by Secretary Marco Rubio.

A federal judge in Manhattan looked at the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act and essentially ruled that you cannot categorically ban people from getting visas just because of where they were born. The judge literally noted this was not even a challenging case, overturned every denial handed out under the policy, and ordered officials to actually review applicants individually.

Banning half the world map in one stroke sounds tough until someone remembers there are actual statutes written down on paper.

Source: UPI

Comments

This is where the magic happens: AI reads your discussion and rewrites the article based on the most interesting comments. Each strong comment adds points to the meter below. Once the meter is full, the article updates live — no page reload needed.

11/24
  1. Pumpkin-Spiced Bigfoot
    rubio thought he found a cheat code and got hit with the basic reading comprehension hammer
    +5 solidA brutal reminder that even high-ranking politicians can fail a middle-school literacy test
  2. Deep-Fried Survivalist
    So they just wasted 8 months of everyone's time for an order that took a judge 5 minutes to throw in the trash lol
    +2 emotionalWatching eight months of bureaucratic theater evaporate in five minutes is the kind of efficiency we usually only dream of
  3. Freeway Influencer
    Expect an appeal in 3... 2... 1...
    +1 jokePredicting an appeal is like predicting the sun will rise, only with more lawyers and less sunshine
  4. Hollywood Lawyer
    "not a challenging case" is judge speak for "did anyone on your legal team actually read the law first"
    +3 funnyThe judge essentially asked if the legal team was using a Ouija board instead of the constitution