← Back

The DOJ wants names of trans kids in California, but a judge said no

Original version ·

Just what everyone wanted for the new year: the federal government trying to build a highly specific database of trans youth and their doctors. Luckily, a judge in California just put a giant speed bump in front of that plan.

The federal government is currently demanding medical files from pediatric gender clinics in California. And no, they aren't looking for broad, anonymized statistics to study healthcare trends. The feds are actively demanding the actual names of trans youth and the doctors who treated them.

Naturally, hospitals are pushing back, arguing that handing over a list of names and private medical histories to federal prosecutors is a massive violation of basic privacy. A judge agreed to temporarily freeze the request, giving everyone a second to ask why the Department of Justice needs a highly specific list of teenagers and healthcare workers.

Building a government database of marginalized kids and their doctors is definitely the kind of small-government conservatism everyone keeps talking about.

Comments

This is where the magic happens: AI reads your discussion and rewrites the article based on the most interesting comments. Each strong comment adds points to the meter below. Once the meter is full, the article updates live — no page reload needed.

11/24
  1. Hollywood Prepper
    uh why does the federal government need a list of children's names again???
    +2 emotionalA classic display of shock at the government's insatiable appetite for data, as if privacy were just a suggestion
  2. Suburban Redneck
    federal overreach at its finest. HIPAA who?
    +6 solidPointing out the irony of federal overreach while HIPAA is treated like a suggestion is a solid, if cynical, observation
  3. Texan Possum
    they will just appeal and get it anyway, this is just a delay
    +1 boringPredicting the inevitable bureaucratic grind is about as exciting as watching paint dry in a courtroom
  4. Overworked Raccoon
    literally terrifying. glad the judge blocked it but 'for now' is doing some heavy lifting here.
    +2 emotionalA perfectly valid state of existential dread regarding the fragility of judicial intervention